Sunday, April 26, 2015

PB 2B

Moves


Janet Boyd’s “Moves”

In the article “Murder! (Rhetorically Speaking) Janet Boyd employs “moves” to make her piece effective. Her first move begins in the title. It is a casual title that doesn’t have too many words as well as fairly simple words. Not many articles on rhetoric have the word “murder” was presents this as slightly unconventional. This unconventionality in the title attracts the readers attention and reflects the format of the rest of the piece. The context in which someone reads this would be similar to what we read it as, an essay that are teachers force us to read and then write about. Therefore, Boyd has a reluctant audience from the beginning of students that you rather not be reading it. This is why her choice, or move, to write not just another rhetoric article and add some fun examples or activities and unconventionality is so important. It sets her apart from all the other writers that students have to read and attempts to spark some enjoyment through reading this. In addition, the examples she gives are things that students don’t normally see in an academic piece. She uses a murder to framework her argument calling the students “detectives” or “coroners” to identify rhetoric. This relates to her audience so the students actually know what she's talking about and can remember the examples that she gave. Janet Boyd’s article has some fresh “moves” in her article to entice her audience and create a memorable piece.

Kerry Dirk’s “Moves”
Dirk opens his article “Navigating Genres” with a joke. No matter the quality of this joke, his move of placing a joke at the beginning creates a casual tone. This tone makes the piece to seem easier to read because it’s not full of jargon to confuse the reader. Just like Boyd’s piece above, Dirk is attempting to catch the attention of students who are being forced to read. This is another reason for a casual tone with jokes. This move attempts to capture the attention of a stubborn audience. He also uses country music as an example. He chose this because many people are familiar with country music and despite their personal preferences, they know enough about so it’s not completely new. Dirk also uses bullets points to change up the structure of his article. This makes it easier to read and adds some pizazz so that the reader doesn't get bored reading only paragraphs. This is also helpful when he gives multiple examples because than they aren’t just place one after another in a sentence. His use of ransom letters provide humorous and distinct examples. This helps the reader remember and distinguish genre. He also quotes many other sources. This supports his argument and persuades the reader that he is a reliable source.


Both these authors use “moves” to make their words and idea come off the page and really resonate with their audiences. There are nuances in every piece of writing that reflects the decisions of the author. I think that every “move” that an author uses is successful to at least one reader. It depends on the attention to detail of the reader. Those who have a very critical view think that some of the less academic aspects make the paper lose credibility, however those who don’t pay much attention to the piece find that stuff to be the only thing keeping them reading. That is why the author must know his audience and with reluctant students, these authors’ “moves” were all successful. 

5 comments:

  1. For the first article, “Murder!” I like you emphasis the “move” of the title. Although it is concise, but it is unconventional and attracts audience. I agree with you that the examples the author chooses are abnormal but interesting, and the reason for this is to make the article impressive for students. It is true that the beginning of Dirk’s article is quite special and casual and choosing this kind of beginning is pleasant for audience. Also, I like you point out that the examples in this article are humorous. However, I am not sure the readers of these articles are all stubborn. Maybe some students love reading and are not forced to read them. (But not me. ) Overall, I think you did a good job in analyzing the choices the authors made when writing these articles.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very thorough job of detecting the moves used in each article! I like that you didn't skip past the title and jump right into the body of the essay, but instead you spent some time focusing on the title as a move itself. I also like that you acknowledged at the end that while some moves may have an undesirable effect on one audience, they may do the complete opposite for another, so the author's knowledge of his/her audience is essential. One suggestion I have is perhaps including more comparisons between the two, in addition to all of the contrasts. Other than that, well done!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I enjoyed reading your PB because you chose different articles to analyze and it was cool to see the process with the 'moves'. I particularly liked the way you pointed out how the title use of the word "Murder" is a big move because it calls attention from the reader. What also was interesting was the comment about Dirk putting a joke in his article and that even if it was a bad joke, it was still a deliberate decision. This really got me thinking about the moves that I analyzed in my PB and how they were deliberately put in place by the author. It was good to see that you addressed how the moves might not be perfect for everyone but will work for at least one reader. I agree!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Claire,

    Boyd’s unconventional title and examples can definitely count as “moves.” More importantly, the answer to the question “why?” is because it takes most of us by surprise—it’s not “same ole” sterilized academic language.

    Dirk’s joke/joking is certainly a move too, and I absolutely love this line you wrote: “This move attempts to capture the attention of a stubborn audience.” Did he succeed? It worked for me. ☺

    Nice blog work.

    PB2A: “Check.”
    PB2B: “Check plus.”

    Grade for both PBs: 5/5

    Z

    ReplyDelete